One limitation of structured interviews is that:

Structured interviews are characterized by a standardized format that involves asking each participant the same set of questions in the same manner. This rigid approach helps ensure consistency and comparability of data across different participants, increasing the reliability of the findings. However, one limitation of structured interviews is that they can miss the depth and nuance that unstructured interviews often capture.

In structured interviews, the strict adherence to the format can sometimes lead to a superficial understanding of the interviewee's thoughts and feelings, as the interviewer is unable to probe deeper into specific responses or explore topics that may emerge organically during the conversation. This limits the richness of the data and may not fully capture the interviewee's experiences or insight.

Comparatively, unstructured interviews allow for greater flexibility, enabling interviewers to adapt their questions based on the responses of the interviewee, which often results in more detailed and varied information. Therefore, while structured interviews can produce reliable data, their inflexibility may hinder the exploration of complex issues, which is a contributing factor to their perceived limitation.