Which act mandates informed parental consent for aversive procedures?

The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA), enacted in 1975, was a significant piece of legislation that ensured the rights of children with disabilities and their families. This act, which laid the groundwork for what is now known as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), contains specific provisions regarding the need for informed parental consent before implementing certain special education services and interventions, which can include aversive procedures.

Informed parental consent is a critical element because it helps to ensure that parents are active participants in decisions affecting their child's education and well-being. The provision for obtaining consent before using aversive techniques recognizes the ethical and legal importance of involving parents in the decision-making process, particularly when interventions may have significant consequences for the child's emotional and physical well-being.

The other choices, while related to education or student rights, do not specifically mandate informed consent for aversive procedures. IDEA 2004 extends and integrates many of the principles established by the EHA, but it is the original act that directly established this requirement. The No Child Left Behind Act primarily focuses on accountability and performance in education, while FERPA deals with student privacy and access to educational records rather than consent for specific educational interventions.